Related topics

Nottingham Ranks as UK’s Most Hygienic City for Hospitality as Food Standards Data Shows Clear Leaders and Laggards

The UK hospitality sector continues to face sustained compliance pressure, with food hygiene inspections remaining one of the most visible and public measures of whether businesses meet their legal obligations. Every rating is published on the Food Standards Agency register, so a poor score represents both a regulatory and reputational risk visible to any customer checking before booking a table or ordering a takeaway.

Online compliance training provider Virtual College has analysed Food Hygiene Rating data across the UK’s largest cities, breaking the results down by premises type to identify where standards are highest, where they are slipping, and which cities face the biggest inspection backlogs.

Nottingham tops the overall rankings

Rank City Avg Hygiene Rating % Rated 1 (Improvement Required) % Rated 5 (Pass) Awaiting Inspection
1 Nottingham 4.84 0.52% 89.58% 88
2 Brighton and Hove 4.75 0.63% 83.08% 109
3 Stoke-on-Trent 4.71 0.83% 80.69% 117
4 Leicester 4.64 1.16% 78.56% 88
5 Bristol 4.64 1.00% 75.78% 217
6 Leeds 4.63 0.70% 72.62% 273
7 Sheffield 4.61 1.27% 74.97% 194
8 Plymouth 4.60 1.28% 76.38% 47
9 Newcastle Upon Tyne 4.59 0.97% 76.20% 76
10 Southampton 4.58 0.98% 72.23% 77
11 Belfast 4.58 0.69% 71.82% 40
12 Norwich 4.54 0.00% 65.65% 82
13 Cardiff 4.52 0.90% 68.44% 147
14 Manchester 4.47 2.34% 68.96% 602
15 London 4.44 1.98% 67.62% 1,565
16 Liverpool 4.33 2.52% 65.26% 668
17 Birmingham 4.28 3.80% 64.47% 479

Takeaways and sandwich shops underperform

Takeaways and sandwich shops are the UK’s weakest-performing premises. Of all six categories analysed, they post the lowest average ratings and the highest failure rates nationwide. Even the best-performing city for this category, Nottingham, only reaches a 76.41% pass rate. In Birmingham, 6.32% of takeaways and sandwich shops are currently rated 1 or “Improvement Required”, the single highest failure rate recorded across any city or category in the study.

Rank City Avg Hygiene Rating % Rated 1 (Improvement Required) % Rated 5 (Pass) Awaiting Inspection
1 Nottingham 4.62 1.61% 76.41% 38
2 Brighton and Hove 4.60 1.41% 76.06% 19
3 Stoke-on-Trent 4.48 1.58% 66.56% 42
4 Leicester 4.41 1.83% 66.36% 40
5 Bristol 4.40 1.60% 61.64% 35
6 Sheffield 4.35 1.64% 58.78% 49
7 Leeds 4.35 0.82% 55.34% 62
8 Norwich 4.32 0.00% 49.16% 23
9 Plymouth 4.30 0.69% 55.56% 13
10 London 4.24 2.68% 56.94% 414
11 Newcastle Upon Tyne 4.23 2.10% 56.99% 16
12 Belfast 4.19 1.02% 48.60% 15
13 Cardiff 4.16 2.03% 48.78% 28
14 Southampton 4.14 2.91% 51.27% 13
15 Manchester 4.06 4.55% 47.05% 157
16 Liverpool 3.85 3.66% 45.12% 248
17 Birmingham 3.77 6.32% 41.91% 78

Schools and healthcare settings post the strongest standards

Premises caring for children, patients, and students consistently return the highest hygiene ratings of any category, with 15 of 17 cities analysed scoring above 4.8 out of 5 for schools, colleges, and universities. Nottingham again tops the table with a near-perfect 4.99 rating, a 98.60% pass rate, and zero premises rated 1 or “Improvement Required”. Hospitals, childcare, and caring premises follow a similar pattern, with Nottingham posting a 97.30% pass rate and only three cities recording any “Improvement Required” ratings at all.
Rank City Avg Hygiene Rating % Rated 1 (Improvement Required) % Rated 5 (Pass) Awaiting Inspection
1 Nottingham 4.99 0.00% 98.60% 2
2 Stoke-on-Trent 4.96 0.00% 97.35% 19
3 Leicester 4.95 0.00% 96.02% 5
4 Plymouth 4.94 0.00% 95.29% 3
5 Leeds 4.94 0.00% 94.47% 10
6 Newcastle Upon Tyne 4.93 0.00% 93.79% 3
7 Belfast 4.93 0.00% 93.26% 1
8 Brighton and Hove 4.90 0.00% 90.91% 7
9 Sheffield 4.89 0.38% 91.35% 3
10 Southampton 4.89 0.00% 90.18% 10
11 Bristol 4.88 0.00% 89.85% 13
12 Manchester 4.86 0.34% 90.38% 15
13 Birmingham 4.83 0.42% 88.47% 29
14 Cardiff 4.82 0.00% 87.50% 2
15 London 4.81 0.51% 87.30% 94
16 Liverpool 4.76 0.00% 83.53% 23
17 Norwich 4.74 0.00% 77.65% 7

Restaurants show the widest gap between best and worst performers

The gap between Nottingham (4.85 average, 89.72% pass) and Birmingham (4.14 average, 59.87% pass) in the restaurant, café, and canteen category is the widest recorded in the dataset for any premises type, a difference of 0.71 in average rating and almost 30 percentage points in pass rate. Birmingham’s 5.05% failure rate in this category is also more than double the UK city average.

Rank City Avg Hygiene Rating % Rated 1 (Improvement Required) % Rated 5 (Pass) Awaiting Inspection Backlog Rank
1 Nottingham 4.85 0.18% 89.72% 30 15
2 Brighton and Hove 4.72 0.77% 81.08% 46 9
3 Stoke-on-Trent 4.65 1.39% 78.39% 37 12
4 Leicester 4.61 1.74% 77.84% 31 14
5 Leeds 4.60 1.12% 71.60% 159 5
6 Bristol 4.59 1.21% 73.57% 129 6
7 Sheffield 4.58 1.61% 73.80% 83 8
8 Southampton 4.58 0.74% 70.85% 34 13
9 Plymouth 4.55 1.00% 74.88% 28 16
10 Belfast 4.54 0.91% 69.75% 17 17
11 Norwich 4.51 0.00% 64.80% 42 11
12 Newcastle Upon Tyne 4.50 1.30% 72.93% 45 10
13 Cardiff 4.44 1.13% 64.74% 92 7
14 Manchester 4.42 2.72% 67.13% 312 2
15 London 4.41 2.16% 66.27% 945 1
16 Liverpool 4.26 3.79% 61.71% 270 3
17 Birmingham 4.14 5.05% 59.87% 263 4

Pubs and bars deliver the best single result, but with pockets of risk

Nottingham’s pub, bar, and nightclub sector achieves the single highest pass rate recorded anywhere in this study, 96.48%, with only 0.44% of premises rated “Improvement Required”. Belfast is the only city in any category to record zero premises currently awaiting inspection. However, Plymouth stands out as an anomaly: despite a respectable 4.50 average rating, it records the highest failure rate of any city in this category at 4.64%, a figure well above the norm in this sector.

Rank City Avg Hygiene Rating % Rated 1 (Improvement Required) % Rated 5 (Pass) Awaiting Inspection Backlog Rank
1 Nottingham 4.94 0.44% 96.48% 11 8
2 Newcastle Upon Tyne 4.81 0.00% 86.49% 7 14
3 Brighton and Hove 4.81 0.35% 84.75% 24 5
4 Manchester 4.73 0.73% 81.83% 33 3
5 Leeds 4.71 0.22% 73.19% 28 4
6 Sheffield 4.70 0.53% 79.74% 11 8
7 Stoke-on-Trent 4.70 0.40% 78.66% 11 8
8 Belfast 4.66 1.13% 72.32% 0 17
9 Bristol 4.64 0.97% 74.13% 10 11
10 Leicester 4.64 0.00% 73.98% 6 15
11 Liverpool 4.61 0.71% 77.30% 73 1
12 London 4.61 1.19% 75.38% 55 2
13 Cardiff 4.57 0.55% 68.31% 18 6
14 Southampton 4.56 0.43% 67.83% 10 11
15 Norwich 4.54 0.00% 66.67% 8 13
16 Birmingham 4.53 1.88% 69.52% 18 6
17 Plymouth 4.50 4.64% 74.83% 2 16

London carries the UK’s biggest inspection backlog

London has more premises awaiting inspection than any other city in every category analysed, and by a substantial margin. Across all premises types combined, the capital has 1,565 outlets awaiting inspection, nearly three times Liverpool’s total, the next-highest city. In the restaurant and café category alone, London’s backlog of 945 premises dwarfs every other city; the next largest, Manchester, sits at 312. Manchester and Liverpool round out the top three cities for backlog size overall, suggesting inspection capacity in the UK’s largest urban centres is struggling to keep pace with volume.

Advice for hospitality operators

Jamie Ashforth, Business and Strategy Director at Virtual College, shared advice for hospitality operators looking to safeguard their compliance standing:

  • Treat every inspection as an audit opportunity. “Don’t wait for an inspector to flag an issue. Regular internal audits against Food Standards Agency criteria help catch problems before they affect your public rating.”
  • Prioritise the categories with the highest risk. “Our data shows takeaway and sandwich shops consistently underperform other premises types. Operators in this category should focus disproportionate attention on food handling and storage practices.”
  • Don’t let staff turnover erode standards. “High staff turnover in hospitality means hygiene training can’t be a one-off induction exercise. Activities like refresher training should be built into every shift pattern change.”
  • Understand your local backlog. “In cities with long inspection waiting lists, businesses may be operating for extended periods without an up-to-date public rating. That makes proactive self-assessment even more important.”
  • Make your rating visible and use it. “A strong hygiene rating is a genuine competitive advantage. Businesses that display and promote their rating tend to build more trust with local customers.

Related topics

Top Stories